tanukimaki:

wanderwonderly:

Robin, what have I done to you

Oh god the joker’s boners one

I’ll show YOU how many boners I can make!

noodlyappendage:

Yesterday, two new comic books from the “New 52” relaunch of DC Comics provoked some online controversy: Catwoman and Red Hood and the Outlaws. They were controversial in particular because of the way they depicted women, notably with the aggressively fanfictiony on-panel sex between Batman and Catwoman, and Starfire’s transformation into a promiscuous tabula rasa who can’t even remember the names of the men she sleeps with, and seeks out emotionless sex with both of the two male main characters while they essentially high five about it.

Since pointing out my issues with Starfire yesterday, I have received numerous e-mails — from men — accusing me of slut-shaming. Since there are a lot of people who don’t understand the sexual dynamics that are in play here both creatively and culturally, I’d like to dissect this a little bit and explain why these scenes don’t support sexually liberated women; they undermine them, and why after nearly 20 years of reading superhero books, these may finally have been the comics that broke me.

Read More: http://www.comicsalliance.com/2011/09/22/starfire-catwoman-sex-superheroine/#ixzz1YigM2xBs

Yep. I love pretty ladies, but I think it’s a shame in comics that women are just chicks with dicks (and this is coming from a lady that is frequently mistaken for a male). Female characters are not just a plot point; they are as varied, distinct and flawed as male characters are.

While I agree with the OP, I kind of resent the use of the term “Chicks with Dicks” to refer to females written by men.  I can’t place it, but it seems somehow cissexist to use the term that way.

For one, my interpretation of that phrase has a very different meaning. And if DC comics was LITERALLY writing comics about MY interpretation of that phrase, well… I would be reading more of their comics.

Yesterday, two new comic books from the “New 52” relaunch of DC Comics provoked some online controversy: Catwoman and Red Hood and the Outlaws. They were controversial in particular because of the way they depicted women, notably with the aggressively fanfictiony on-panel sex between Batman and Catwoman, and Starfire’s transformation into a promiscuous tabula rasa who can’t even remember the names of the men she sleeps with, and seeks out emotionless sex with both of the two male main characters while they essentially high five about it.

Since pointing out my issues with Starfire yesterday, I have received numerous e-mails — from men — accusing me of slut-shaming. Since there are a lot of people who don’t understand the sexual dynamics that are in play here both creatively and culturally, I’d like to dissect this a little bit and explain why these scenes don’t support sexually liberated women; they undermine them, and why after nearly 20 years of reading superhero books, these may finally have been the comics that broke me.

Read More: http://www.comicsalliance.com/2011/09/22/starfire-catwoman-sex-superheroine/#ixzz1YigM2xBs

batlesbo:

rinacat:

narcolepticbunny:

tychosexual:

sen1227:

even though I don’t much care for Ivy I still love this episode and it’s one of my very very favorites

and I’m suddenly in lesbians with these two again

So rare to see villainess genuinely having a good time.

Don’t remember how many times I’ve watched that episode. Such a sweet moment<3 

(Ivy’s cosplaying Kim Possible xD )

My brother has got me to watch some Batman episodes.  I liked this one not because I particularly cared for any of the main characters, but I was really intrigued by Baby Doll’s henchwoman, “Miriam.”  The wiki page completely erased her from the episode description, so I guess she isn’t a recurring character. Too bad.

I would like to know more about this kickboxing badass in a business suit and why she is willing to protect and play mommy to a 30-year-old-in-a-5-year-old’s-body.   I would LOVE to read a whole comic just about that screwed up relationship.

Also, she totally beat the crap out Batman and Robin with just a couple kicks, that’s pretty awesome.

halleypropism:

nilecrocodile:

rosalarian:

I didn’t draw this, but I approve this message.

sexy

strong characters

Now here is some quality entertainment, at a far more affordable price.

oracle-create-a-thon:

[image: Cass sits on the left behind a desk clutching papers, and on the right in front of the desk, Babs sits with one hand under her chin and her eyes closed. Cass is attempting to read what is on the paper to Babs, and Babs helps her when she gets stuck. Cass: “Although I ca-can cannot move and I have to speak t-th-” Babs: “Through” Cass: “Through a com-computer, in my mind I am-” Babs: “Free.” The image is in sepia tone.]

Afternoon reading lessons

Highly relevant to previous posts.

Ok, so I just watched the trailer for Batman: Arkham City.

I can summarize it in 2 words: Catwoman’s BUTT.

You know what game I want to see? A game called CATMAN where you play as a super sexed up BDSM-themed in a speedo.

In the trailer, he makes lots of sexy cat jokes and the camera spends most of the time zooming in on his fabulous, clenched buttocks.  He also beats up thugs in Matrix-ripoff, slow motion sequences, all while spouting vaguely cat-themed sexual innuendos, even occasionally making out with the guys he’s punching.